Fresh facts are now
emerging on why the Federal Government last week withdrew the charges
against Elder Godson Orubebe, a former minister in charge of the
Ministry of Niger Delta in the administration of former President
Goodluck Jonathan who was arraigned before the Code of Conduct Tribunal,
CCT, on allegations of false declaration of assets.
Sources confirmed that the decision to withdraw the charges was based on
a legal advice from the Federal Ministry of Justice in which it was
strongly canvassed that the case against Orubebe as presently
constructed and filed was fundamentally defective.
The legal advice from the Ministry of Justice was to the effect that
since Orubebe was not invited to make a statement on the allegations
against him, the process of arraignment was fundamentally flawed.
The legal advice referred to Section 379 sub-section (1) (a) of the
Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015 which listed the ingredients
that must be forwarded as part the process to be filed by the
prosecution before the commencement of the case as including in (iv) “
copies of statements of the defendant”.
Read more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2016/03/cct-fg-withdrew-case-orubebe/
Read more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2016/03/cct-fg-withdrew-case-orubebe/
Fresh facts are now
emerging on why the Federal Government last week withdrew the charges
against Elder Godson Orubebe, a former minister in charge of the
Ministry of Niger Delta in the administration of former President
Goodluck Jonathan who was arraigned before the Code of Conduct Tribunal,
CCT, on allegations of false declaration of assets.
Sources confirmed that the decision to withdraw the charges was based on
a legal advice from the Federal Ministry of Justice in which it was
strongly canvassed that the case against Orubebe as presently
constructed and filed was fundamentally defective.
The legal advice from the Ministry of Justice was to the effect that
since Orubebe was not invited to make a statement on the allegations
against him, the process of arraignment was fundamentally flawed.
The legal advice referred to Section 379 sub-section (1) (a) of the
Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015 which listed the ingredients
that must be forwarded as part the process to be filed by the
prosecution before the commencement of the case as including in (iv) “
copies of statements of the defendant”.
Read more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2016/03/cct-fg-withdrew-case-orubebe/
Read more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2016/03/cct-fg-withdrew-case-orubebe/
0 comments:
Post a Comment